Meteen naar document

Thums Up Presentation

Presentation Thums Up
Vak

English for E&BE (EBP837B05)

99 Documenten
Studenten deelden 99 documenten in dit vak
Studiejaar: 2016/2017
Geüpload door:
Anonieme student
Dit document is geüpload door een student, net als jij, die anoniem wil blijven.
Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam

Reacties

inloggen of registreren om een reactie te plaatsen.

Preview tekst

One of the options for Parle limited is to quickly negotiate with either Coca-Cola or Pepsi to see wether it is possible to sell the Thums Up brand to either competitor. Thums Up currently has an 85% market share in India with the majority of the share being loyal to Thums Up. Overall Coca-Cola and Pepsi taste less sweet in comparison to Thums Up and therefore we should not fail to realize that we have an extraordinary product. Pros of selling thumbs up:  The risk involved is minimal we would face absolutely no risks when selling the company completely. Something we do face when choosing any other direction.  Capital will gain Cons of selling thumbs up:  simply handing over network in India We have something very valuable that both Coca-Cola and Pepsi do not have which is an incredibly large network in India. By simply selling off the company to competitors, these networks would go to waste, so a much more profitable deal can be made for both parties by not selling off the company.  Missed opportunities for profit in the long-run To explain this point I will move on to the next slide where i will go into further detail of our other brands Limca and Gold Spot. -By selling off the company completely we can use this capital to further invest in the branding of Limca and Gold Spot but we will not be able to tap into the network of the giants pepsi and coca cola. We will also run the risk that by selling off to coca cola, they will feel no obligation to not introduce their similar drinks Sprite and Fanta. This creates more competition and will work counter-profitable. -By forming an alliance between either pepsi or coca cola we can use their networks and capital to promote Limca and Gold spot more in India, increase distribution and even move the brand across borders. In the alliance agreement we can also state that the alliance partner is not allowed to introduce a product in India that is similar to Limca or Gold Spot, thus creating a superior position for these brands. Therefore we as consultants say that it is not in our best interest to sell Thums Up to either CocaCola or Pepsi, rather we should look at the opportunities to form an alliance with either one of these competitors. Our consultant Bart Staal will now go into further detail to discuss this option.

Was dit document nuttig?

Thums Up Presentation

Vak: English for E&BE (EBP837B05)

99 Documenten
Studenten deelden 99 documenten in dit vak
Was dit document nuttig?
One of the options for Parle limited is to quickly negotiate with either Coca-Cola or Pepsi to see
wether it is possible to sell the Thums Up brand to either competitor.
Thums Up currently has an 85% market share in India with the majority of the share being loyal to
Thums Up. Overall Coca-Cola and Pepsi taste less sweet in comparison to Thums Up and therefore
we should not fail to realize that we have an extraordinary product.
Pros of selling thumbs up:
The risk involved is minimal
we would face absolutely no risks when selling the company completely. Something we do face when
choosing any other direction.
Capital will gain
Cons of selling thumbs up:
simply handing over network in India
We have something very valuable that both Coca-Cola and Pepsi do not have which is an incredibly
large network in India. By simply selling off the company to competitors, these networks would go
to waste, so a much more profitable deal can be made for both parties by not selling off the
company.
Missed opportunities for profit in the long-run
To explain this point I will move on to the next slide where i will go into further detail of our other
brands Limca and Gold Spot.
-By selling off the company completely we can use this capital to further invest in the branding of
Limca and Gold Spot but we will not be able to tap into the network of the giants pepsi and coca
cola. We will also run the risk that by selling off to coca cola, they will feel no obligation to not
introduce their similar drinks Sprite and Fanta. This creates more competition and will work
counter-profitable.
-By forming an alliance between either pepsi or coca cola we can use their networks and capital to
promote Limca and Gold spot more in India, increase distribution and even move the brand across
borders. In the alliance agreement we can also state that the alliance partner is not allowed to
introduce a product in India that is similar to Limca or Gold Spot, thus creating a superior position
for these brands.
Therefore we as consultants say that it is not in our best interest to sell Thums Up to either Coca-Cola
or Pepsi, rather we should look at the opportunities to form an alliance with either one of these
competitors.
Our consultant Bart Staal will now go into further detail to discuss this option.