Meteen naar document
Dit is een Premium document. Sommige documenten op Studeersnel zijn Premium. Upgrade naar Premium om toegang te krijgen.

Example Exam questions week 3

Vak

Impact Evaluation (UC-17-ECB304)

5 Documenten
Studenten deelden 5 documenten in dit vak
Studiejaar: 2017/2018
Geüpload door:
Anonieme student
Dit document is geüpload door een student, net als jij, die anoniem wil blijven.
Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam

Reacties

inloggen of registreren om een reactie te plaatsen.

Preview tekst

Example Exam questions week 3 – Fixed Effects and Difference-in -Difference

  1. Consider the following figure

What would be the expected outcome for the treatment group at time 1 in absence of treatment (i. “the counterfactual”) in a Difference-in-Difference (DiD) design? a. 6 b. 4 c. 2 d. 14

  1. What could be a problem with randomization that leads to bias in the estimation of the Average Treatment Effect on the Treated (ATT)? a. Non-parallel trends b. Small treatment effects c. Possible spillover effects to non-treated d. Limited common support

  2. Consider the following figure, in which treatment takes place between t = 0 and t=

What is a problem when conducting a Differences-in-Differences design in this case?

a. There may be observed time-invariant factors that influence the outcome b. The observed outcomes at time 0 (before treatment) are different, such that the estimates are confounded by this initial difference c. The parallel trends assumptions is unlikely to hold, since pre-treatment trends are different d. The outcomes for the treated are initially higher than the ones for the control group

  1. What is the parallel trends assumption? a. Treated and non-treated would otherwise have had the same outcomes b. In an arbitrarily small interval around the relevant threshold, treatment assignment can be considered random c. Outcomes of treated and non-treated would have changed in the same way in absence of treatment d. There are no other determinants of outcomes changing between pre and post intervention

  2. Twin fixed effects is a popular method to establish the causal effect of some treatment

variable on an outcome. Say that we have two twins 1 and 2, Y is the outcome, T is treatment, X are family specific variables, and G are genes specific to the twin pair p.

l fp f p

l l fp

l fp f p

l l fp

fp

fp Y T X G

Y T X G

2

1 2 2

1 1     

    

    

    

In order to obtain the causal effect of treatment T on the outcome Y, typically the difference between two twins, Y 1 – Y 2 is taken. Which statement is NOT true regarding Twin Fixed Effects estimation? a. Twins should differ in their treatment status T, otherwise we cannot use the twin pair in the estimation of the causal effect of treatment on the outcome b. Twin fixed effects studies are particularly vulnerable to measurement error because one has to take differences within twin pairs c. Within-twins pair treatment variation may be correlated with unobserved within-twins factors that directly affect the outcome d. Twin fixed effects studies can estimate the coefficient β of unobserved family characteristics Xf

Answers:

  1. D

  2. C

  3. C

  4. C

  5. A

  6. A

  7. D

Was dit document nuttig?
Dit is een Premium document. Sommige documenten op Studeersnel zijn Premium. Upgrade naar Premium om toegang te krijgen.

Example Exam questions week 3

Vak: Impact Evaluation (UC-17-ECB304)

5 Documenten
Studenten deelden 5 documenten in dit vak
Was dit document nuttig?

Dit is een preview

Wil je onbeperkt toegang? Word Premium en krijg toegang tot alle 5 pagina's
  • Toegang tot alle documenten

  • Onbeperkt downloaden

  • Hogere cijfers halen

Uploaden

Deel jouw documenten voor gratis toegang

Ben je al Premium?
Example Exam questions week 3 Fixed Effects and Difference-in-Difference
1. Consider the following figure
What would be the expected outcome for the treatment group at time 1 in absence of
treatment (i.e. “the counterfactual”) in a Difference-in-Difference (DiD) design?
a. 6
b. 4
c. 2
d. 14
2. What could be a problem with randomization that leads to bias in the estimation of the
Average Treatment Effect on the Treated (ATT)?
a. Non-parallel trends
b. Small treatment effects
c. Possible spillover effects to non-treated
d. Limited common support

Waarom is deze pagina onscherp?

Dit is een Premium document. Word Premium om het volledige document te kunnen lezen.